4. Route Options – Retail Park to High Street

Published Categorised as Consultations, Route Options

We’ve been busy developing route options, designed to meet a significant number of routine journeys in the main directions (West – East and also South North) to trip generators and along obvious desire lines, while avoiding heavily trafficked main roads.

Here’s the final proposal from the retail park to the town centre, using the verge of Kellie Rd to achieve a higher degree of segregation from traffic, while using existing paths, and traffic calmed areas.

We’ve opened comments so you can leave a specific comment or general ones on the options appraised and the aggregate scores:

Summary appraisal

4a. Spott Rd4b. Eastern paths route4c. New path beside Kellie Rd4d. Ashfield Park route with new and existing paths
FromRetail park entrancesRetail park entrancesRetail park entrancesRetail park entrances
ViaSpott Road (on road for cycles), and thence via existing path towards cemetry, Queens Rd, Abbey RoadEast on existing good shared use path via rail underbridge to Dempster Place, Comrie Avenue, Manderson Drive, and existing good shared use path to Spott Rd crossing, and thence via existing path towards cemetry, Queens Rd, Abbey Roadvia improved shared use pavement to Kellie Rd roundabout, then widened shared use path in southern verge of Kellie Rd to sports fields, and either north to Countess Crescent crossing, OR northeast to station underpass, Countess Rd, Abbey Rdvia improved shared use pavement to Kellie Rd roundabout, then widened shared use path in southern verge of Kellie Rd to new link path to Brunt Court, existing path to Ashfield Park, existing path to Station underpass, Countess Rd, Abbey Rd. 
This route also provide links on existing paths to Spott Rd Industrial Estates.
ToHigh StreetHigh StreetBleachingfield Ctr/ High StHigh Street
Option score381817
Options along the Spott Rd are heavily constrained, but routes via Kellie Road and through Ashfield provide greater possibilities for good segregation from traffic until you hit the Abbey Church gyratory system

We look at the following criteria to evaluate the options. We score each criterion on a scale -3 to +3. The highest theoretical score possible is 27. The lowest -27.

NB Open the map to comment using the buttons above and below

Evaluation Criteria

Safety
Design should minimise the potential for actual and perceived risk of accidents for all users.
Directness
Design should be as direct as possible and minimise detours and delays. The impact of junctions and crossings on journey times should be considered.
Coherence
Design should be continuous and consistent from origin to destination.
Comfort
Design should meet surface width, quality and gradient standards and be convenient by avoiding complex manoeuvres.
Attractiveness
Design should complement and enhance its environment in such a way that cycling is attractive.
Adaptability
Design should consider the potential for future expansion and cater for an anticipated rise in the number of people cycling.
Accessibility
Design should comply with the Equality Act 2010 and cater for all types of bike
Socio-economic
Local businesses should benefit
Deliverability
Constraints and objections should be overcome in delivery timeframe.
Each criterion derived from Cycling by Design is unweighted

Comment on individual route options

By Connecting Dunbar

Making it easier to walk, wheel and cycle in Dunbar